桃子视频

Little Rock, Ark.--A federal district court judge has an Arkansas law that aimed to ban gender-affirming care for transgender youth, finding the law violates the Constitutional rights of transgender youth, their parents, and their medical providers. The court held that plaintiffs prevailed on all their claims, finding the ban violated the Equal Protection Clause, the Due Process Clauses, and the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

The decision follows a weeks-long trial in the fall of 2022 and is the first final merits ruling in the country on such a law.

鈥淚鈥檓 so grateful the judge heard my experience of how this health care has changed my life for the better and saw the dangerous impact this law could have on my life and that of countless other transgender people,鈥� said Dylan Brandt, a 17-year-old transgender boy from Arkansas. 鈥淢y mom and I wanted to fight this law not just to protect my health care, but also to ensure that transgender people like me can safely and fully live our truths. Transgender kids across the country are having their own futures threatened by laws like this one, and it鈥檚 up to all of us to speak out, fight back, and give them hope.

鈥淲e're relieved and grateful that the court has ruled in favor of these brave Arkansans and their rights, protecting life-saving care that should be available to all trans youth,鈥� said Holly Dickson, Executive Director of the 桃子视频of Arkansas. 鈥淭his decision sends a clear message. Fear-mongering and misinformation about this health care do not hold up to scrutiny; it hurts trans youth and must end. Science, medicine, and law are clear: gender-affirming care is necessary to ensure these young Arkansans can thrive and be healthy.鈥�

鈥淭his ruling offers an enormous relief to transgender youth and their families across Arkansas and across the country,鈥� said Chase Strangio, Deputy Director for Transgender Justice at the ACLU鈥檚 LGBTQ & HIV Project. 鈥淚n state after state, transgender people are being forced to fight for our most basic rights, including access to the health care many of us need to live. This victory shows that these laws, when tested by evidence, are indefensible under any standard of constitutional review. We hope that this sends a message to other states about the vulnerability of these laws and the many harms that come from passing them. We鈥檙e so thankful for the bravery of our clients and the tireless work of advocates in Arkansas.鈥�

The law was challenged by four families of transgender youth and two doctors. The law also barred any state funds or insurance coverage for gender-affirming health care for transgender people under 18, and it would have allowed private insurers to refuse to cover gender-affirming care for people of any age.

Similar laws in Alabama, Florida, and Indiana are blocked by preliminary injunctions from federal courts. In 2023 thus far, the 桃子视频and its nationwide affiliate network have challenged seven new laws similar to Arkansas鈥檚 ban.

The lawsuit in Arkansas was filed by the ACLU鈥檚 Jon L. Stryker and Slobodan Randjelovi膰 LGBTQ & HIV Project, the 桃子视频of Arkansas, and the law firms of Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Gill Ragon Owen, and the Walas Law Firm.

For more on Brandt v. Rutledge, click here: /cases/brandt-et-al-v-rutledge-et-al