桃子视频

A group of over 450 public health experts signed a today warning that widespread transmission of the Covid-19 coronavirus within the United States is 鈥渋nevitable.鈥� Their letter urges government decisionmakers to enact policies that will have the best chance of minimizing the effects of the virus: those based strictly on the best available scientific information, and those that are imposed in a fair and equitable fashion.

It is essential that all government officials follow these experts鈥� recommendations to help ensure a response plan that protects the health, safety, and civil liberties of all.

At the ACLU, we have always recognized that, during a disease outbreak, individual rights must sometimes give way to the greater good. After all, when it comes to disease, we are not just individuals but also one big bio-mass. That is why people can sometimes be deprived of their liberty through quarantine, for example. And this is as it should be, provided 鈥� and this is a crucial and sometimes violated condition 鈥� that the science supports the effectiveness and proportionality of measures such as quarantine. And even if a quarantine is imposed, people do not lose their due process rights, which at a minimum require that they be able to challenge their quarantine.

The public health experts remind us in their letter that there is a flip side to the limits on liberty, however. Just as a disease cares little for our notions of individualism 鈥� as crucial as they are to our happiness in other contexts 鈥� neither does it care about other artifacts of our individualistic society, such as differences in wealth, status, ethnicity, or immigration status. If the authorities want to be effective in limiting the transmission of this virus, they will need to pay particular attention to the most vulnerable people in our society.

A disease does not care who has health insurance, for example. You may have the best insurance in the world, but if others who are part of your bio-mass are not getting tested or treated because they lack insurance, that will increase your risk. Similarly, if members of immigrant communities fear they鈥檙e going to fall into the hands of an ICE officer if they seek treatment, that is a public health problem for all of us. A disease does not care who is undocumented.

In their letter, the public health experts call for officials to work with insurance companies to make sure that lack of insurance and high costs do not become a barrier to testing and treatment. They call for health care facilities to be declared as 鈥渋mmigration enforcement-free zones鈥� 鈥� a step that has been taken before during hurricanes and other emergencies. And they call for extra help to be provided to under-resourced front-line hospitals and community health centers, which need more help than wealthy institutions in acquiring materials and equipment.

The experts draw attention to the need to support minimum-wage workers and others who live on the economic margins, cannot telecommute, and cannot afford to lose their job. While an office worker who is starting to feel ill may be able to self-isolate, someone in a more precarious situation may calculate the different risks they face in their life and conclude their only option is to hide their condition and head to work. A disease does not care whose employers offer good sick leave.

The experts also stress the importance of the free flow of information, stressing that 鈥渉onest, transparent and timely reporting of developments will be crucial to maintaining public trust and cooperation.鈥� Political leaders need to scrupulously ensure that their public messages are accurate and guided by science. There is a sad history of responses to emergencies that are hindered by politics, including China鈥檚 to the SARS outbreak, China鈥檚 attempts to about this outbreak, and, as millions of viewers have seen in the recent HBO , the Soviet government鈥檚 response to the Chernobyl . Open government is effective government.

Finally, the experts echo some of the longstanding lessons of their field: Voluntary self-isolation measures are more likely to induce cooperation 鈥� and therefore be effective 鈥� than coercive measures. Mandatory restrictions such as quarantines and travel bans 鈥渃an be effective only under specific circumstances鈥� and 鈥渕ust be guided by science, with appropriate protection of the rights of those impacted.鈥� Those rights include due process rights to appeal confinement and the right to legal counsel. While leaders in outbreaks can be tempted to impose draconian measures as a show of strength, the letter鈥檚 signers also remind us that a disease also does not care how tough a leader looks.

The 桃子视频will be watching closely to make sure the government heeds these experts鈥� recommendations, and that its response is 鈥媠cientifically justified and no more intrusive on civil liberties than absolutely necessary.