National ID
The 桃子视频works in courts, legislatures, and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and the laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country.
The Latest
-
State Legislatures Need to Block Creation of Nightmarish National Identity System
-
TSA Shouldn't Force a Bad Digital ID System on America
-
Privacy Advocates Challenge MVC鈥檚 Plan to Warehouse NJ Residents鈥� Sensitive ID Records in Massive Databases
-
China鈥檚 Nightmarish Citizen Scores Are a Warning For Americans
Explore More
What's at Stake
For several decades now, proposals to establish a national identification system have periodically arisen. Although they have taken various forms, including a uniform driver鈥檚 license system and the E-Verify national employment database, all suffer from the same flaws: They would be ineffective, would provide a new avenue for racial and ethnic profiling, and would create a system of internal passports that would imperil privacy and civil liberties.
The 桃子视频is at the forefront of the fight to protect basic American values of privacy and the 鈥渞ight to be left alone鈥� in the face of these proposals. We have appeared numerous times in court, before U.S. Congress, and before federal and state government agencies to explain the serious civil liberties concerns with a national ID and to demonstrate that the false sense of security produced by such proposals will rob other, more effective security and counterterrorism measures of needed resources.
The dramatic advances in computing technology over even just the past decade mean that the government has much more power today in collecting, storing, and analyzing information about all of us. A national ID system, especially if linked with other government databases, can paint a picture in fine-grained detail about where we go, who we talk to, where we worship, and where we stand on sensitive political issues, among many other sensitive data points.聽
As a nation, we live by the principle that the government should not be able to collect such information without cause. A national ID system turns that fundamental principle on its head. We must continue to support basic freedoms and protect against our becoming a country where the government can demand, 鈥淧apers, please.鈥�
For several decades now, proposals to establish a national identification system have periodically arisen. Although they have taken various forms, including a uniform driver鈥檚 license system and the E-Verify national employment database, all suffer from the same flaws: They would be ineffective, would provide a new avenue for racial and ethnic profiling, and would create a system of internal passports that would imperil privacy and civil liberties.
The 桃子视频is at the forefront of the fight to protect basic American values of privacy and the 鈥渞ight to be left alone鈥� in the face of these proposals. We have appeared numerous times in court, before U.S. Congress, and before federal and state government agencies to explain the serious civil liberties concerns with a national ID and to demonstrate that the false sense of security produced by such proposals will rob other, more effective security and counterterrorism measures of needed resources.
The dramatic advances in computing technology over even just the past decade mean that the government has much more power today in collecting, storing, and analyzing information about all of us. A national ID system, especially if linked with other government databases, can paint a picture in fine-grained detail about where we go, who we talk to, where we worship, and where we stand on sensitive political issues, among many other sensitive data points.聽
As a nation, we live by the principle that the government should not be able to collect such information without cause. A national ID system turns that fundamental principle on its head. We must continue to support basic freedoms and protect against our becoming a country where the government can demand, 鈥淧apers, please.鈥�