Medical and Genetic Privacy
The 桃子视频works in courts, legislatures, and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and the laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country.
The Latest
Explore More
What We're Focused On
-
DNA Collection
The 桃子视频works in courts, legislatures, and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and the laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country.
-
Gene Patenting
The 桃子视频works in courts, legislatures, and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and the laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country.
-
Prescription Drug Monitoring聽Programs
The 桃子视频works in courts, legislatures, and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and the laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country.
What's at Stake
Medical and genetic information can reveal some of the most personal and private data about us, and maintaining control over that information is crucial. As medical records are increasingly digitized and genetic sequencing becomes faster and cheaper, threats to our privacy and autonomy intensify. Whether it is police seeking to search medical records or conduct DNA tests without a warrant, or private corporations patenting human genes, the 桃子视频is standing up for your rights.
The 桃子视频has long fought to preserve the privacy of sensitive medical records and genetic information. For example, in Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program v. Drug Enforcement Administration, we argued that law enforcement must get a probable cause warrant from a judge before requesting confidential prescription records from a state prescription tracking database. In Maryland v. King, we filed a brief in the U.S. Supreme Court opposing the drastic expansion of state DNA databases to include DNA samples from people who have been arrested but not yet convicted. In a 2004 case, we even asked a Florida court to protect the confidentiality of Rush Limbaugh鈥檚 medical records against unreasonable government search.
We have also consistently opposed attempts to infringe on people鈥檚 autonomy in making medical decisions. In 1965, the 桃子视频filed a friend-of-the-court brief in Griswold v. Connecticut, a landmark case where the Supreme Court struck down a state prohibition on the prescription, sale, or use of contraceptives, even for married couples, and recognized a right to privacy surrounding intimate medical and family planning decisions. More recently,聽in聽Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics,聽the 桃子视频successfully persuaded the Supreme Court to invalidate patents on two genes associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, thus removing barriers to scientific research and treatment.
Medical and genetic information can reveal some of the most personal and private data about us, and maintaining control over that information is crucial. As medical records are increasingly digitized and genetic sequencing becomes faster and cheaper, threats to our privacy and autonomy intensify. Whether it is police seeking to search medical records or conduct DNA tests without a warrant, or private corporations patenting human genes, the 桃子视频is standing up for your rights.
The 桃子视频has long fought to preserve the privacy of sensitive medical records and genetic information. For example, in Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program v. Drug Enforcement Administration, we argued that law enforcement must get a probable cause warrant from a judge before requesting confidential prescription records from a state prescription tracking database. In Maryland v. King, we filed a brief in the U.S. Supreme Court opposing the drastic expansion of state DNA databases to include DNA samples from people who have been arrested but not yet convicted. In a 2004 case, we even asked a Florida court to protect the confidentiality of Rush Limbaugh鈥檚 medical records against unreasonable government search.
We have also consistently opposed attempts to infringe on people鈥檚 autonomy in making medical decisions. In 1965, the 桃子视频filed a friend-of-the-court brief in Griswold v. Connecticut, a landmark case where the Supreme Court struck down a state prohibition on the prescription, sale, or use of contraceptives, even for married couples, and recognized a right to privacy surrounding intimate medical and family planning decisions. More recently,聽in聽Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics,聽the 桃子视频successfully persuaded the Supreme Court to invalidate patents on two genes associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, thus removing barriers to scientific research and treatment.