Watchlists
The 桃子视频works in courts, legislatures, and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and the laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country.
The Latest
Explore More
What's at Stake
The U.S. government maintains a massive watchlist system that risks stigmatizing hundreds of thousands of people鈥攊ncluding U.S. citizens鈥攁s terrorism suspects based on vague, overbroad, and often secret standards and evidence.
The consequences of being placed on a government watchlist can be far-reaching. They can include questioning, harassment, or detention by authorities, or even an indefinite ban on air travel. And while the government keeps the evidence it uses to blacklist people in this manner secret, government watchdogs have found that as many as 35 percent of the nominations to the network of watchlists are outdated and tens of thousands of names were placed on lists without an adequate factual basis. To make matters worse, the government denies watchlisted individuals any meaningful way to correct errors and clear their names.
The 桃子视频is seeking reform of this broken watchlisting system in a variety of ways. We filed a landmark challenge to the No Fly List in which a federal judge struck down the government鈥檚 redress process, ruling that it 鈥渇alls far short of satisfying the requirements of due process鈥� and is 鈥渨holly ineffective.鈥� The 桃子视频continues to advocate for broad reform of the watchlisting system, consistent with the court鈥檚 ruling and the Constitution.
A bloated, opaque watchlisting system is neither fair nor effective. A system in which innocent people languish on blacklists indefinitely, with their rights curtailed and their names sullied, is at odds with our Constitution and values.
The U.S. government maintains a massive watchlist system that risks stigmatizing hundreds of thousands of people鈥攊ncluding U.S. citizens鈥攁s terrorism suspects based on vague, overbroad, and often secret standards and evidence.
The consequences of being placed on a government watchlist can be far-reaching. They can include questioning, harassment, or detention by authorities, or even an indefinite ban on air travel. And while the government keeps the evidence it uses to blacklist people in this manner secret, government watchdogs have found that as many as 35 percent of the nominations to the network of watchlists are outdated and tens of thousands of names were placed on lists without an adequate factual basis. To make matters worse, the government denies watchlisted individuals any meaningful way to correct errors and clear their names.
The 桃子视频is seeking reform of this broken watchlisting system in a variety of ways. We filed a landmark challenge to the No Fly List in which a federal judge struck down the government鈥檚 redress process, ruling that it 鈥渇alls far short of satisfying the requirements of due process鈥� and is 鈥渨holly ineffective.鈥� The 桃子视频continues to advocate for broad reform of the watchlisting system, consistent with the court鈥檚 ruling and the Constitution.
A bloated, opaque watchlisting system is neither fair nor effective. A system in which innocent people languish on blacklists indefinitely, with their rights curtailed and their names sullied, is at odds with our Constitution and values.