Discriminatory Profiling
鈥淣ational security鈥� has long been used to justify the unconstitutional profiling of, and discrimination against, Muslim, Black, Brown, and other historically marginalized communities. The 桃子视频fights for the individuals and communities harmed by the government鈥檚 discriminatory practice of using race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, national origin, or ethnicity as a basis for suspicion or investigation.
What you need to know
The Latest
-
Customs and Border Protection is Singling Out Muslim Travelers for Invasive Religious Questioning
-
I Refused to Become an FBI Informant, and the Government Put Me on the No Fly List
-
A Secret CBP Team is Targeting and Detaining Innocent Travelers. We鈥檙e Suing.
-
How the FBI Spied on Orange County Muslims And Attempted to Get Away With It
Explore More
What's at Stake
The FBI, CBP, TSA, and other federal law enforcement agencies have long engaged in discriminatory and unconstitutional profiling of people of color, immigrants, and other marginalized communities, including those engaged in First Amendment-protected activities. The people that federal agencies target have mostly been Black civil rights activists, Muslim and communities, Asian Americans, animal rights and environmental rights activists, and groups the government views as having 鈥渦npopular鈥� or controversial beliefs. As a result, people are wrongly and secretly surveilled, investigated, prosecuted, or placed on federal watchlists.
Biased federal policing falsely stigmatizes people who aren鈥檛 even suspected of actual wrongdoing, as well as entire communities. Using the color of someone鈥檚 skin, the religion they practice, or where they were born as a basis for suspicion should be left in the history books, where it belongs.
This type of biased profiling occurs in large part because the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security, which are the country鈥檚 main federal law enforcement agencies, have anti-discrimination policies that actually permit discrimination. Although these departments say they recognize profiling is unjust, ineffective, and a waste of resources, they nevertheless permit it in the broad and vaguely defined categories of national security, intelligence-gathering, and at the border 鈥� where we鈥檝e seen often occur.
The harmful practices can also spread to state and local law enforcement. Federally-funded partnerships between federal, state, and local law enforcement, such as FBI-led and DHS-led Fusion Centers, collect and share substantial amounts of personal data about individuals and have come under criticism and scrutiny for bias-infused reporting, analysis, and investigations, and for their lack of meaningful civil rights, liberties, and privacy safeguards.
The 桃子视频has taken a multi-faceted approach to challenging discriminatory federal law enforcement policies, including litigation on behalf of Americans subjected to biased and unlawful surveillance, advocacy with Congress and federal agencies for comprehensive anti-discrimination policies, as well as raising awareness of the corrosive effect of discriminatory profiling on affected communities. We will keep fighting for systematic change and legislation that prohibits biased profiling without exceptions for national and border security, in order to protect communities that have for so long been wrongly targeted and harmed.
The FBI, CBP, TSA, and other federal law enforcement agencies have long engaged in discriminatory and unconstitutional profiling of people of color, immigrants, and other marginalized communities, including those engaged in First Amendment-protected activities. The people that federal agencies target have mostly been Black civil rights activists, Muslim and communities, Asian Americans, animal rights and environmental rights activists, and groups the government views as having 鈥渦npopular鈥� or controversial beliefs. As a result, people are wrongly and secretly surveilled, investigated, prosecuted, or placed on federal watchlists.
Biased federal policing falsely stigmatizes people who aren鈥檛 even suspected of actual wrongdoing, as well as entire communities. Using the color of someone鈥檚 skin, the religion they practice, or where they were born as a basis for suspicion should be left in the history books, where it belongs.
This type of biased profiling occurs in large part because the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security, which are the country鈥檚 main federal law enforcement agencies, have anti-discrimination policies that actually permit discrimination. Although these departments say they recognize profiling is unjust, ineffective, and a waste of resources, they nevertheless permit it in the broad and vaguely defined categories of national security, intelligence-gathering, and at the border 鈥� where we鈥檝e seen often occur.
The harmful practices can also spread to state and local law enforcement. Federally-funded partnerships between federal, state, and local law enforcement, such as FBI-led and DHS-led Fusion Centers, collect and share substantial amounts of personal data about individuals and have come under criticism and scrutiny for bias-infused reporting, analysis, and investigations, and for their lack of meaningful civil rights, liberties, and privacy safeguards.
The 桃子视频has taken a multi-faceted approach to challenging discriminatory federal law enforcement policies, including litigation on behalf of Americans subjected to biased and unlawful surveillance, advocacy with Congress and federal agencies for comprehensive anti-discrimination policies, as well as raising awareness of the corrosive effect of discriminatory profiling on affected communities. We will keep fighting for systematic change and legislation that prohibits biased profiling without exceptions for national and border security, in order to protect communities that have for so long been wrongly targeted and harmed.