Family Detention
The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵworks in courts, legislatures, and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and the laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country.
The Latest
-
Government Agencies Shouldn't Be Allowed to Destroy Their Paper Trail of Medical Abuse and Neglect
-
20 Years Later, It’s Time to Overhaul the Department of Homeland Security
-
Why Is America So Keen on Separating Families?
-
New Guidance Fails to Stop Mistreatment of Pregnant People and Their Children in Detention
Explore More
What's at Stake
ÌýMost of the Central American families detained by DHS have come to the U.S. seeking refugee protection, having fled one of the most dangerous regions in the world where women and children are raped, abused, and killed with impunity. Eighty-eight percent of detained families have demonstrated to a DHS asylum officer that they have a credible fear of persecution if deported.
Ìý
Since the summer of 2014, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵhas been working to halt the administration’s family detention practices. In February, a federal judge issued an order in RILR v. Johnson, an ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵclass action suit challenging DHS’s policy of detaining families seeking asylum, in order to deter future migration from Central America. The court blocked DHS from relying on general deterrence as a basis to detain families.Ìý
ÌýMost of the Central American families detained by DHS have come to the U.S. seeking refugee protection, having fled one of the most dangerous regions in the world where women and children are raped, abused, and killed with impunity. Eighty-eight percent of detained families have demonstrated to a DHS asylum officer that they have a credible fear of persecution if deported.
Ìý
Since the summer of 2014, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵhas been working to halt the administration’s family detention practices. In February, a federal judge issued an order in RILR v. Johnson, an ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵclass action suit challenging DHS’s policy of detaining families seeking asylum, in order to deter future migration from Central America. The court blocked DHS from relying on general deterrence as a basis to detain families.Ìý
Support our on-going litigation and advocacy work