Internet Speech
The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵworks in courts, legislatures, and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and the laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country.
The Latest
-
Child Safety, Free Speech, and Privacy Experts Tell Supreme Court: Texas’s Unconstitutional Age Verification Law Must be Overturned
-
Free Speech Coalition Urges Supreme Court to Strike Down Texas’ Unconstitutional Age Verification Law
-
ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵSlams Senate Passage of Kids Online Safety Act, Urges House to Protect Free Speech
-
ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵStatement on Latest Congressional Attempt to Dismantle Free Speech Online
Explore More
What We're Focused On
-
Communications Decency Act Section 230
The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵworks in courts, legislatures, and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and the laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country.
-
Net Neutrality
The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵworks in courts, legislatures, and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and the laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country.
-
Online Anonymity and Identity
The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵworks in courts, legislatures, and communities to defend and preserve the individual rights and liberties that the Constitution and the laws of the United States guarantee everyone in this country.
What's at Stake
The digital revolution has produced the most diverse, participatory, and amplified communications medium humans have ever had: the Internet. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵbelieves in an uncensored Internet, a vast free-speech zone deserving at least as much First Amendment protection as that afforded to traditional media such as books, newspapers, and magazines.
The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵhas been at the forefront of protecting online freedom of expression in its myriad forms. We brought the first case in which the U.S. Supreme Court declared speech on the Internet equally worthy of the First Amendment’s historical protections. In that case, Reno v. ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵ, the Supreme Court held that the government can no more restrict a person’s access to words or images on the Internet than it can snatch a book out of someone’s hands or cover up a nude statue in a museum.
But that principle has not prevented constant new threats to Internet free speech. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵremains vigilant against laws or policies that create new decency restrictions for online content, limit minors’ access to information, or allow the unmasking of anonymous speakers without careful court scrutiny.
The digital revolution has produced the most diverse, participatory, and amplified communications medium humans have ever had: the Internet. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵbelieves in an uncensored Internet, a vast free-speech zone deserving at least as much First Amendment protection as that afforded to traditional media such as books, newspapers, and magazines.
The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵhas been at the forefront of protecting online freedom of expression in its myriad forms. We brought the first case in which the U.S. Supreme Court declared speech on the Internet equally worthy of the First Amendment’s historical protections. In that case, Reno v. ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵ, the Supreme Court held that the government can no more restrict a person’s access to words or images on the Internet than it can snatch a book out of someone’s hands or cover up a nude statue in a museum.
But that principle has not prevented constant new threats to Internet free speech. The ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵremains vigilant against laws or policies that create new decency restrictions for online content, limit minors’ access to information, or allow the unmasking of anonymous speakers without careful court scrutiny.