Arkansas
Brandt et al v. Rutledge et al
Four families of transgender youth and two doctors have challenged an Arkansas law that would prohibit healthcare professionals from providing or even referring transgender young people for medically necessary health care. The law would also bar any state funds or insurance coverage for gender-affirming health care for transgender people under 18, and it would allow private insurers to refuse to cover gender-affirming care for people of any age. The lawsuit, filed in federal court, alleges that House Bill 1570 is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.
Status: Ongoing
View Case
All Cases
16 Arkansas Cases
Arkansas
Jan 2024
Voting Rights
NAACP v. Arkansas Board of Apportionment
This case has two key parts: First, the Arkansas House district map diminishes the voting power of Black voters. Second, both the district court and Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals radically concluded that voters may not sue to protect their voting rights under Section 2, putting the VRA in further jeopardy and contradicting decades of precedent in which impacted voters 鈥� particularly Black voters 鈥� have challenged racially discriminatory voting laws.
Explore case
Arkansas
Jan 2024
Voting Rights
NAACP v. Arkansas Board of Apportionment
This case has two key parts: First, the Arkansas House district map diminishes the voting power of Black voters. Second, both the district court and Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals radically concluded that voters may not sue to protect their voting rights under Section 2, putting the VRA in further jeopardy and contradicting decades of precedent in which impacted voters 鈥� particularly Black voters 鈥� have challenged racially discriminatory voting laws.
Arkansas
Jul 2023
Free Speech
NetChoice v. Griffin
Arkansas鈥檚 so-called 鈥淪ocial Media Safety Act鈥� stifles freedom of expression online by requiring users to verify their ages and, if under 18, obtain explicit parental consent before using social media.
Explore case
Arkansas
Jul 2023
Free Speech
NetChoice v. Griffin
Arkansas鈥檚 so-called 鈥淪ocial Media Safety Act鈥� stifles freedom of expression online by requiring users to verify their ages and, if under 18, obtain explicit parental consent before using social media.
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2023
Criminal Law Reform
Jones v. Hendrix
The issue in the case is whether federal prisoners who could not 鈥� because established law stood firmly against them 鈥� and therefore did not challenge their convictions can challenge those convictions when the Supreme Court later overrules the prior precedent upon which their convictions were based, making them legally innocent of the crime of conviction.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Mar 2023
Criminal Law Reform
Jones v. Hendrix
The issue in the case is whether federal prisoners who could not 鈥� because established law stood firmly against them 鈥� and therefore did not challenge their convictions can challenge those convictions when the Supreme Court later overrules the prior precedent upon which their convictions were based, making them legally innocent of the crime of conviction.