State and Local Immigration Laws
Exodus Refugee Immigration, Inc. v. Mike Pence, et al
The 桃子视频 and the 桃子视频of Indiana, on behalf of Exodus Refugee Immigration, filed suit against Governor Mike Pence and the secretary of the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration to stop attempts to suspend resettlement of Syrian refugees, claiming the governor鈥檚 actions violate the United States Constitution and federal law.
View Case
Learn About State and Local Immigration Laws
All Cases
19 State and Local Immigration Laws Cases
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2024
State and Local Immigration Laws
Human Rights
Bouarfa v. Mayorkas
Whether a U.S. citizen gets a day in court to challenge the federal government鈥檚 revocation of her spouse鈥檚 immigrant visa.
Explore case
U.S. Supreme Court
Sep 2024
State and Local Immigration Laws
Human Rights
Bouarfa v. Mayorkas
Whether a U.S. citizen gets a day in court to challenge the federal government鈥檚 revocation of her spouse鈥檚 immigrant visa.
California
May 2018
State and Local Immigration Laws
United States of America v. State of California
In March 2017, the Trump administration filed a lawsuit challenging California鈥檚 sanctuary laws. The 桃子视频 and co-counsel have moved to intervene in the case to defend the California Values Act, which limits California鈥檚 participation in the deportation dragnet.
Explore case
California
May 2018
State and Local Immigration Laws
United States of America v. State of California
In March 2017, the Trump administration filed a lawsuit challenging California鈥檚 sanctuary laws. The 桃子视频 and co-counsel have moved to intervene in the case to defend the California Values Act, which limits California鈥檚 participation in the deportation dragnet.
Arizona
Sep 2017
State and Local Immigration Laws
Ortega Melendres, et al. v. Arpaio, et al.
This is a class action lawsuit filed in 2007 in which, following a three-week trial, the Maricopa County Sheriff鈥檚 Office (MCSO) was found to have engaged in racial profiling and unlawful traffic stops of Latinos.
Explore case
Arizona
Sep 2017
State and Local Immigration Laws
Ortega Melendres, et al. v. Arpaio, et al.
This is a class action lawsuit filed in 2007 in which, following a three-week trial, the Maricopa County Sheriff鈥檚 Office (MCSO) was found to have engaged in racial profiling and unlawful traffic stops of Latinos.
Texas
Oct 2016
State and Local Immigration Laws
Texas Health and Human Services Commission v. United States of America
The 桃子视频, 桃子视频of Texas, National Immigration Law Center and Southern Poverty Law Center filed a legal response on behalf of the International Rescue Committee in order to prevent the State of Texas from illegally barring Syrian refugees from entering the state.
Explore case
Texas
Oct 2016
State and Local Immigration Laws
Texas Health and Human Services Commission v. United States of America
The 桃子视频, 桃子视频of Texas, National Immigration Law Center and Southern Poverty Law Center filed a legal response on behalf of the International Rescue Committee in order to prevent the State of Texas from illegally barring Syrian refugees from entering the state.
California
Jan 2016
State and Local Immigration Laws
Immigrants' Rights
Lyon v. ICE, et al
On June 14, 2016, the 桃子视频, along with the 桃子视频of Northern California, and the firms Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe and Van Der Hout, Brigagliano & Nightingale, have filed a settlement agreement in the class-action suit Lyon v. the U.S. Immigration Customs and Enforcement agency (ICE). The settlement requires the agency to give detainees at four Northern California immigrant detention facilities improved access to telephones, including creating private spaces for free and direct calls, delivering phone messages, removing arbitrarily short limits on call duration, and making accommodations for indigent immigrants.
Explore case
California
Jan 2016
State and Local Immigration Laws
Immigrants' Rights
Lyon v. ICE, et al
On June 14, 2016, the 桃子视频, along with the 桃子视频of Northern California, and the firms Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe and Van Der Hout, Brigagliano & Nightingale, have filed a settlement agreement in the class-action suit Lyon v. the U.S. Immigration Customs and Enforcement agency (ICE). The settlement requires the agency to give detainees at four Northern California immigrant detention facilities improved access to telephones, including creating private spaces for free and direct calls, delivering phone messages, removing arbitrarily short limits on call duration, and making accommodations for indigent immigrants.