ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵ

Enacted in 1986, EMTALA requires any hospital with an emergency room that receives Medicare funds (virtually all hospitals) to provide stabilizing treatment to anyone who comes to the hospital experiencing an emergency medical condition. Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, one of the most restrictive abortion bans in the country went into effect in Idaho.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) filed this lawsuit against Idaho in August 2022, seeking an injunction to allow patients to receive emergency abortions, as required under this federal law. A lower court granted the injunction, but anti-abortion politicians appealed that ruling to the Supreme Court, which lifted the injunction and took the case in January.

In March 2024, the ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵ (ACLU), ÌÒ×ÓÊÓƵof Idaho, and the law firm Cooley LLP filed an amicus brief in the case explaining that Idaho’s arguments cannot be justified under the Supreme Court’s own precedents, and that all three branches of government have long recognized that hospitals are required under EMTALA to provide emergency abortion care to any patient who needs it.

As a result of this ban, medical providers have found themselves having to decide between providing necessary emergency care to a pregnant patient and facing criminal prosecution from the state, or declining medical care and leaving a patient in crisis while facing federal sanctions for violating EMTALA.

Since Idaho’s extreme abortion ban took effect, who have chosen to leave the state and practice elsewhere,

Medical professionals, from the American College of Emergency Physicians and American Hospital Association to the and the , have underscored that doctors must be able to provide their patients with the emergency abortion care they need.